PROOF
SMH 05.11.07
Files reveal the silly, scary
spies' eye-view of Aboriginal
history
Joel Gibson
CITY WEEKLY 01.11.07
Proof positive
Josie Gagliano
EXPRESS ADVOCATE 30.05.07
Art Culture
Kate Moore
SMH 20.04.04
Beyond fashion to fine
portraiture
Robert McFarlane
SMH 02.04.04
Spotlight: Photography
Sunanda Creagh
SMH 26.03.04
Metro: The Week's Best
Alex Tibbitts, Editor
ART & AUSTRALIA Vol 41 #3
Juno Gemes
Sasha Grishin
SMH 01.01.04
Mixed media in frame
Anne Loxley
ART MONTHLY #166 12.03
Photographic Proof I
Catherine De Lorenzo
ART MONTHLY #166 12.03
Photographic Proof II
Jennifer Isaacs
MUSE #231 08.03
We are also what we have lost
David Wills
CANBERRA TIMES 23.08.03
Political images
Zoja Bojic
SMH 09.07.03
Charting the moves for justice
Angela Bennie
AAS 2003/2
Juno Gemes in conversation
WHERE THE SACRED FISH
COME IN
THE LANGUAGE OF
OYSTERS
|
|
Reviews
Art
& Australia
Vol. 41 No. 3 March-May 2004
Art Review:
Juno Gemes
Sasha Grishin
When the new Parliament House was being built in Canberra in
the early 1980s, graffiti appeared on the construction hoardings on Capital Hill
reading: White Australia has a Black History. The Movement
is part of that Black history. Since the erection of the first tent of the Aboriginal
Embassy on the lawns opposite Old Parliament House in 1972, The Movement, through
various strategies, has brought to national consciousness not only the land rights
struggle, but a whole raft of cultural, political, social and economic issues.
Juno Gemess recent exhibition of sixty-seven black-and-white mounted photographs
and sixty-seven colour images on DVD at the National Portrait Gallery in Canberra
documents some of the faces central to The Movement.
Documentary photography is not a satisfactory term
when applied to Gemess work. Her photographs only partially relate to this
tradition and to the concept of a camera with a conscience. She assembles
the photographic visual evidence in the form of an illustrated history. The title
of the exhibition, Proof: Portraits from The Movement 19782003,
also suggests that the artist intends the photographs to be read as evidence and
documentation. However, what is presented is a very partisan insiders portrait
of The Movement, where a sense of intimacy and empathy is established between
the photographer and her subjects. When viewed as a sequence, we experience a
curious sensation of being simultaneously inside The Movement, almost as participants,
and outside it, as observers and sympathetic witnesses.
In photographs such as Remembering Brian Syron, 1993, Gary
Foley, Invasion Day We have survived, 1988, or Kevin Gilbert and
Joe outside Anti-Bicentennial and Treaty 88 meeting, 1987, there is
an expression of both pride and defiance. The formal structure suggests a casual
glance with the randomness of a snapshot in the compositional arrangements, but
there is also a note of authority, an awareness that we are witnessing historically
significant events.
Other photographs are painstakingly deliberate, somewhat reminiscent
of the immaculately constructed images of Dorothea Lange, rather than those of
the more brutalist approach of Weegee (Arthur Fellig) and Lisette
Model with whom Gemes is often compared. Gemes presents an unforgettabe gallery
of some of the memorable figures in The Movement, such as Bill Reid
Elder, artist, 1979, shown standing at the ballot box, Kumatjay Perkins
speaking out at the Roma Forum, 1982, as part of a demonstration connected
with the land rights movement in Queensland, and the actor Ernie Dingo, shown
in a wonderfully composed image with Cate Blanchett, photographed on the Heartland
filmset in Brooklyn, New South Wales, in 1994.
There is also a sense of inevitability in Gemess most successful
photographs. She has the ability to capture the moment when her subject has found
its complete resolution. Take, for example, the remarkable image Countrymen,
1978, showing elders from Aurukun, Mornington Island, greeting each other
before a ceremony. The three elders, framed by a huge sprawling gum tree, have
momentarily come together in an interwoven, emotionally charged embrace, yet are
about to separate and launch into movement. By adopting a very low vantage point,
reminiscent of Lisette Models, Gemes has given her image a monumental presence.
Had the photograph been taken a moment before or a moment later, the wonderful
tracery of energy which links the three figures would have dissipated.
Rhonda Davis, in her catalogue essay, recounts how Gemes, after
she had arrived in Australia with her family in 1949 as a five-year-old from her
native Hungary, was shy of her imperfect command of English. For a year after
her arrival she pretended to be a deaf-mute. During that year, I learned
to read people by gesture, movement, body language and tone of voice.1
Throughout her photographs we experience this quality of an inner voice. Her selection
of the moment of exposure corresponds precisely to the time when a subjects
hand gestures, body language and eye movements are at their most expressive. While
in some photographic exhibitions we experience a hushed silence, like in a church
ceremony, or an amazement at the photographers technical virtuosity, Gemess
photographic essay, in contrast, appears like a noisy corroboree, where the colourful
characters the leaders, heroes and entertainers are all determined
to have their say and to engage us with their presence. While Gemes documents
some of the main players and events associated with the Aboriginal cause over
the past three decades, she allows her images to speak for themselves without
resorting to technical tricks or clever encoded narratives.
Although the Aboriginal movement has been one of the most significant
aspects of recent Australian history and has given birth to many memorable photographic
images, it has produced no single major photographic chronicler, no authorised
or unauthorised comprehensive photographic survey. Gemes's exhibition was
an important and brilliant illumination of the Black history of Australia and
speaks with an authoritative voice. As Lisette Model once famously observed: The
great authority is the picture itself. It isnt the public ... it isnt
the editor, it isnt the teacher ... The picture is the greatest symptom and
the most precise, the one that doesnt lie.2
| TOP
|